prd-purpose.md 7.1 KB

BMAD PRD Purpose

The PRD is the top of the required funnel that feeds all subsequent product development work in rhw BMad Method.


What is a BMAD PRD?

A dual-audience document serving:

  1. Human Product Managers and builders - Vision, strategy, stakeholder communication
  2. LLM Downstream Consumption - UX Design → Architecture → Epics → Development AI Agents

Each successive document becomes more AI-tailored and granular.


Core Philosophy: Information Density

High Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Every sentence must carry information weight. LLMs consume precise, dense content efficiently.

Anti-Patterns (Eliminate These):

  • ❌ "The system will allow users to..." → ✅ "Users can..."
  • ❌ "It is important to note that..." → ✅ State the fact directly
  • ❌ "In order to..." → ✅ "To..."
  • ❌ Conversational filler and padding → ✅ Direct, concise statements

Goal: Maximum information per word. Zero fluff.


The Traceability Chain

PRD starts the chain:

Vision → Success Criteria → User Journeys → Functional Requirements → (future: User Stories)

In the PRD, establish:

  • Vision → Success Criteria alignment
  • Success Criteria → User Journey coverage
  • User Journey → Functional Requirement mapping
  • All requirements traceable to user needs

Why: Each downstream artifact (UX, Architecture, Epics, Stories) must trace back to documented user needs and business objectives. This chain ensures we build the right thing.


What Makes Great Functional Requirements?

FRs are Capabilities, Not Implementation

Good FR: "Users can reset their password via email link" Bad FR: "System sends JWT via email and validates with database" (implementation leakage)

Good FR: "Dashboard loads in under 2 seconds for 95th percentile" Bad FR: "Fast loading time" (subjective, unmeasurable)

SMART Quality Criteria

Specific: Clear, precisely defined capability Measurable: Quantifiable with test criteria Attainable: Realistic within constraints Relevant: Aligns with business objectives Traceable: Links to source (executive summary or user journey)

FR Anti-Patterns

Subjective Adjectives:

  • ❌ "easy to use", "intuitive", "user-friendly", "fast", "responsive"
  • ✅ Use metrics: "completes task in under 3 clicks", "loads in under 2 seconds"

Implementation Leakage:

  • ❌ Technology names, specific libraries, implementation details
  • ✅ Focus on capability and measurable outcomes

Vague Quantifiers:

  • ❌ "multiple users", "several options", "various formats"
  • ✅ "up to 100 concurrent users", "3-5 options", "PDF, DOCX, TXT formats"

Missing Test Criteria:

  • ❌ "The system shall provide notifications"
  • ✅ "The system shall send email notifications within 30 seconds of trigger event"

What Makes Great Non-Functional Requirements?

NFRs Must Be Measurable

Template:

"The system shall [metric] [condition] [measurement method]"

Examples:

  • ✅ "The system shall respond to API requests in under 200ms for 95th percentile as measured by APM monitoring"
  • ✅ "The system shall maintain 99.9% uptime during business hours as measured by cloud provider SLA"
  • ✅ "The system shall support 10,000 concurrent users as measured by load testing"

NFR Anti-Patterns

Unmeasurable Claims:

  • ❌ "The system shall be scalable" → ✅ "The system shall handle 10x load growth through horizontal scaling"
  • ❌ "High availability required" → ✅ "99.9% uptime as measured by cloud provider SLA"

Missing Context:

  • ❌ "Response time under 1 second" → ✅ "API response time under 1 second for 95th percentile under normal load"

Domain-Specific Requirements

Auto-Detect and Enforce Based on Project Context

Certain industries have mandatory requirements that must be present:

  • Healthcare: HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules, PHI encryption, audit logging, MFA
  • Fintech: PCI-DSS Level 1, AML/KYC compliance, SOX controls, financial audit trails
  • GovTech: NIST framework, Section 508 accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), FedRAMP, data residency
  • E-Commerce: PCI-DSS for payments, inventory accuracy, tax calculation by jurisdiction

Why: Missing these requirements in the PRD means they'll be missed in architecture and implementation, creating expensive rework. During PRD creation there is a step to cover this - during validation we want to make sure it was covered. For this purpose steps will utilize a domain-complexity.csv and project-types.csv.


Document Structure (Markdown, Human-Readable)

Required Sections

  1. Executive Summary - Vision, differentiator, target users
  2. Success Criteria - Measurable outcomes (SMART)
  3. Product Scope - MVP, Growth, Vision phases
  4. User Journeys - Comprehensive coverage
  5. Domain Requirements - Industry-specific compliance (if applicable)
  6. Innovation Analysis - Competitive differentiation (if applicable)
  7. Project-Type Requirements - Platform-specific needs
  8. Functional Requirements - Capability contract (FRs)
  9. Non-Functional Requirements - Quality attributes (NFRs)

Formatting for Dual Consumption

For Humans:

  • Clear, professional language
  • Logical flow from vision to requirements
  • Easy for stakeholders to review and approve

For LLMs:

  • ## Level 2 headers for all main sections (enables extraction)
  • Consistent structure and patterns
  • Precise, testable language
  • High information density

Downstream Impact

How the PRD Feeds Next Artifacts:

UX Design:

  • User journeys → interaction flows
  • FRs → design requirements
  • Success criteria → UX metrics

Architecture:

  • FRs → system capabilities
  • NFRs → architecture decisions
  • Domain requirements → compliance architecture
  • Project-type requirements → platform choices

Epics & Stories (created after architecture):

  • FRs → user stories (1 FR could map to 1-3 stories potentially)
  • Acceptance criteria → story acceptance tests
  • Priority → sprint sequencing
  • Traceability → stories map back to vision

Development AI Agents:

  • Precise requirements → implementation clarity
  • Test criteria → automated test generation
  • Domain requirements → compliance enforcement
  • Measurable NFRs → performance targets

Summary: What Makes a Great BMAD PRD?

High Information Density - Every sentence carries weight, zero fluff ✅ Measurable Requirements - All FRs and NFRs are testable with specific criteria ✅ Clear Traceability - Each requirement links to user need and business objective ✅ Domain Awareness - Industry-specific requirements auto-detected and included ✅ Zero Anti-Patterns - No subjective adjectives, implementation leakage, or vague quantifiers ✅ Dual Audience Optimized - Human-readable AND LLM-consumable ✅ Markdown Format - Professional, clean, accessible to all stakeholders


Remember: The PRD is the foundation. Quality here ripples through every subsequent phase. A dense, precise, well-traced PRD makes UX design, architecture, epic breakdown, and AI development dramatically more effective.