name: 'step-08-scoping' description: 'Define MVP boundaries and prioritize features across development phases'

File References

nextStepFile: './step-09-functional.md' outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/prd.md'

Task References

advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'

partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'

Step 8: Scoping Exercise - MVP & Future Features

Progress: Step 8 of 11 - Next: Functional Requirements

MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):

🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between PM peers
📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
💬 FOCUS on strategic scope decisions that keep projects viable
🎯 EMPHASIZE lean MVP thinking while preserving long-term vision
✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config {communication_language}

EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:

🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
📚 Review the complete PRD document built so far
⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating scoping decisions
💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step name to the end of the list of stepsCompleted
🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected

CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:

Complete PRD document built so far is available for review
User journeys, success criteria, and domain requirements are documented
Focus on strategic scope decisions, not feature details
Balance between user value and implementation feasibility

YOUR TASK:

Conduct comprehensive scoping exercise to define MVP boundaries and prioritize features across development phases.

SCOPING SEQUENCE:

1. Review Current PRD State

Analyze everything documented so far:

Present synthesis of established vision, success criteria, journeys
Assess domain and innovation focus
Evaluate scope implications: simple MVP, medium, or complex project
Ask if initial assessment feels right or if they see it differently

2. Define MVP Strategy

Facilitate strategic MVP decisions:

Explore MVP philosophy options: problem-solving, experience, platform, or revenue MVP
Ask critical questions:
- What's the minimum that would make users say 'this is useful'?
- What would make investors/partners say 'this has potential'?
- What's the fastest path to validated learning?
Guide toward appropriate MVP approach for their product

3. Scoping Decision Framework

Use structured decision-making for scope:

Must-Have Analysis:

Guide identification of absolute MVP necessities
For each journey and success criterion, ask:
- Without this, does the product fail?
- Can this be manual initially?
- Is this a deal-breaker for early adopters?
Analyze journeys for MVP essentials

Nice-to-Have Analysis:

Identify what could be added later:
- Features that enhance but aren't essential
- User types that can be added later
- Advanced functionality that builds on MVP
Ask what features could be added in versions 2, 3, etc.

4. Progressive Feature Roadmap

Create phased development approach:

Guide mapping of features across development phases
Structure as Phase 1 (MVP), Phase 2 (Growth), Phase 3 (Vision)
Ensure clear progression and dependencies
Core user value delivery
Essential user journeys
Basic functionality that works reliably

Phase 2: Growth

Additional user types
Enhanced features
Scale improvements

Phase 3: Expansion

Advanced capabilities
Platform features
New markets or use cases

Where does your current vision fit in this development sequence?"

5. Risk-Based Scoping

Identify and mitigate scoping risks:

Technical Risks: "Looking at your innovation and domain requirements:

What's the most technically challenging aspect?
Could we simplify the initial implementation?
What's the riskiest assumption about technology feasibility?"

Market Risks:

What's the biggest market risk?
How does the MVP address this?
What learning do we need to de-risk this?"

Resource Risks:

What if we have fewer resources than planned?
What's the absolute minimum team size needed?
Can we launch with a smaller feature set?"

6. Generate Scoping Content

Prepare comprehensive scoping section:

Content Structure:

## Project Scoping & Phased Development

### MVP Strategy & Philosophy

**MVP Approach:** {{chosen_mvp_approach}}
**Resource Requirements:** {{mvp_team_size_and_skills}}

### MVP Feature Set (Phase 1)

**Core User Journeys Supported:**
{{essential_journeys_for_mvp}}

**Must-Have Capabilities:**
{{list_of_essential_mvp_features}}

### Post-MVP Features

**Phase 2 (Post-MVP):**
{{planned_growth_features}}

**Phase 3 (Expansion):**
{{planned_expansion_features}}

### Risk Mitigation Strategy

**Technical Risks:** {{mitigation_approach}}
**Market Risks:** {{validation_approach}}
**Resource Risks:** {{contingency_approach}}

7. Present MENU OPTIONS

Present the scoping decisions for review, then display menu:

Show strategic scoping plan (using structure from step 6)
Highlight MVP boundaries and phased roadmap
Ask if they'd like to refine further, get other perspectives, or proceed
Present menu options naturally as part of conversation

Display: "Select: [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Functional Requirements (Step 9 of 11)"

Menu Handling Logic:

IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask} with the current scoping analysis, process the enhanced insights that come back, ask user if they accept the improvements, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow} with the scoping context, process the collaborative insights on MVP and roadmap decisions, ask user if they accept the changes, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
IF C: Append the final content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter by adding this step name to the end of the stepsCompleted array, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu

EXECUTION RULES:

ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
After other menu items execution, return to this menu

APPEND TO DOCUMENT:

When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.

SUCCESS METRICS:

✅ Complete PRD document analyzed for scope implications ✅ Strategic MVP approach defined and justified ✅ Clear MVP feature boundaries established ✅ Phased development roadmap created ✅ Key risks identified and mitigation strategies defined ✅ User explicitly agrees to scope decisions ✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly ✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected

FAILURE MODES:

❌ Not analyzing the complete PRD before making scoping decisions ❌ Making scope decisions without strategic rationale ❌ Not getting explicit user agreement on MVP boundaries ❌ Missing critical risk analysis ❌ Not creating clear phased development approach ❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation

❌ CRITICAL: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions ❌ CRITICAL: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file ❌ CRITICAL: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols

NEXT STEP:

After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load {nextStepFile}.

Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-09 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!

step-08-scoping.md 8.0 KB Историја Датотека